GK Deck Thoughts- poseidon_victorious



Hello! I am doing an article on Gravekeepers. One thing I do not understand is that Gravekeeper Deck are filled to the brims with anything but Gravekeepers. I saw a Breaker, a Jinzo, and many other cards in the mix. I do not believe that these cards belong in a Gravekeeper deck. Contrary to popular opinion, I do not belive that Jinzo is a staple in every type of beatdown deck. I believe that, indeed, sometimes decks can even do without them

(GASP!). Then Breaker, and i dont have any idea why this is in here.....

A Gravekeeper deck is supposed to have Gravekeepers in it. Although not the best card, I think that Curse is a great card to play in Gravekeeper decks, or any burner for that matter. With all the SS, ull get it out in no time, and then get it back again and again. Cannonholder is another card i rarely see played. It too, can be a game winner at the right moment, or against a stall/burner deck. My GK deck has only 4 monsters that are not Gravekeepers:

1xWOTBF

1xSangan

1xCyber Jar

1xSasuke Samurai

WOTBF and Sangan are obvious, and Cyber Jar is for the SS. Sasuke Samurai is a great game finisher at the right time. All the rest of the cards are Gravekeepers. I have only 1 tribute, and that is Chief.

So there, I said it. I think that Jinzo shouldnt be in a Gravekeeper deck at all.


Send hate mail and opinoins to:

poseidon_victorious@yahoo.com


- - - poseidon_victorious