Subject: Error by Thomas Woods regarding Waboku The Waboku rulings on the new spreadsheet and the Upper Deck FAQ actually ARE consistent. The FAQ on the official website is assuming that the attacking monster has a higher ATK power than the monster of the person using Waboku, whereas the spreadsheet just posted on pojo uses an example in which both monsters have the same attack power. A little more clearly, here's the difference: Like Thomas Woods says, the official website FAQ reads "'Waboku' is a Trap Card that is flipped during your opponent's Battle Phase to stop his attack and protect your monsters. No damage is taken by either player; no monsters are destroyed on either side." That scenario assumes that your opponent is attacking with a higher ATK monster than yours. So if your opponent's Summoned Skull is attacking your Gemini Elf and you flip Waboku, no monsters are destroyed and no damage is taken because a) YOU are protected by Waboku and b) HE is not taking any damage anyway because his monster has higher ATK. Now, in the rulings just posted on pojo, the scenario is different. They use the example of both players having monsters of equal attack power and one using Waboku. Here's how that works: Your opponent's Gemini Elf attacks YOUR Gemini Elf. Normally, both monsters would be destroyed. But you flip Waboku. Now, his monster dies, but it's not because of Waboku. It's because of the basic rule that says when two monsters of equal ATK are both in attack position and are involved in a battle, they are both destroyed. Because you flipped Waboku, YOUR Gemini Elf is protected from that rule. However, his Gemini Elf is not, so it dies. The ruling spreadsheet uses Mega Thunderball as the example monster, but the point is that there's two of the same monster involved as opposed to one monster having higher ATK. The rulings are consistent, but the examples provided and/or assumed are different, and that is what is causing confusion. Email me at SamTiger54@yahoo.com with questions. peace- Tiger