This is a response to an artilce about mine from
DarkArticuno, No Removal Gym is no Big Deal. His comments are in blue, mine
are in black.
Before I start, let me just tell you that you'll have
to read his / her article to fully understand what going on here.
Fair enough, but I believe it does that job
well, and you haven't told us why it's useless.
Actually, I've explained it VERY clearly why No Removal Gym
is otherwise useless. You just did'nt read that part properly.
Excuse me? A LOT of
people use Energy Removal and Super Energy Removal still. I mean they're not
as popular as they were before, but guess why that is: No Removal Gym
All I'm going to say is: Please note the part when I said:
(hardly anybody I know). And I DO know a lot of people concerning the TCG.
We know that Raindance isn't all that
vunerable to E.R and S.E.R. It's been mentioned time and time again, but when
did many good raindances run Retrieval?
I don't know, but I strongly believe that most
Raindances(especiallly if they have a low Energy count) should have at least
three Energy Retrieval or Super Energy Retrieval so that when the Energy is
removed, you just Energy Retrieval it back, then Raindance.
See, I hadn't noticed this, but youu think
decks might run more than one No Reoval Gym, or use Item Finder?
Yes, but do YOU think your deck also might run more than
one Gym that would counterattack No Removal Gym, or use Item Finder as well?
You seem to misunderstand... No Removal Gym
is not designed to stop people beating decks using it, it's designed (and
used) to take away part of you opponants offensive.
But you see... if your deck has no E.R or S.E.R, what good
will No Removal Gym be? And since No Removal Gym's only purpose is to make the
playability of E.R and S.E.R much harder, it won't take away anything from you
opponent, offensive or defensive.
I jut thought I'd reply to this article
because it seemed like an angry argument that was wrong.
HAH! Now, in my honest opinion, I think this comment is
uncalled for. First off, my article was not an argument about ANYTHING.
Secondly, my article is most certainly not wrong. Plus, it's my opinion.
- UltraMaster64