alright. the whether man doesnt like the point system. neither do alot of
others like satoshi and mr. wizard and alot others still. first off, i want
to say get a life and think of ur own ideas. seconed, the whether man said
that the author decides who wins in cards. ill say. in dk raichu 5/4 the
whether man says that rocket raichu is the best raichu so far. cmon. r u
kidding. theres only a 25% chance that it will do 20 to the bench. theres a
25% chance that it will backfire and a 50% chance of doing 30 damage (no side
effects). theres as much of a chance that haunter will get to use dream eater
that raichu has of killing 20 of the bench, and haunter cant backfire by
hurting his teammates. this is raichus only attack and this guy has 10 less
HP than the base raichu and base raichu can use a strategic agility which is
better than surprise thunder and a poerful attack thats better too. thunder.
the point is, there is no actual way to compare cards because the author
chooses who wins. u said it ur self whether man and people can make anyone
win almost nomatter what.
the big point is: THESE R ALL OPPINIONS. JUST OPPINIONS. BLASTOISE IS BETTER
THAN WEEDLE IS AN OPPINION. CHARIZARD IS BETTER THAN GEODUDE IS AN OPPINION.
DK RAICHU IS BETTER THAN RAICHU IS AN OPPINION AND I DONT CARE BECAUSE IF U
THINK THAT THEN THATS FINE. someone can also lose every tourney and still
think there decks the best. i have an undefeated raindance and u can say it
stinks and thats also oppinions. if u disagree with me try considering going
to a public school or looking up facts and oppinions at the library. for the
whether man and any other person who writes replys to mail, get a life and
ask ur teacher about facts and oppinions.



ps. i dont like base haunter at all. he was just an example because of his
bad attacks.

e-mail adress. GT1287@aol.com